What are my obligations when my client moves to another accountant?
| by Ian Waters, Nicole Ziman 06 Mar 2007 Topic: Business law |
|||
|
Many of the complaints received by ACCA about its practitioners arise when a client intends to move to another accountant (the prospective accountant). In most cases, they arise from the practitioners’ misunderstanding of their obligations. Ian Waters and Nicole Ziman guide you through your obligations as the existing accountant for the client You should expect to be contacted by the prospective accountant so that he or she may determine whether there might be any reasons not to accept the appointment (often referred to as ‘professional clearance’) and, on the assumption that the appointment will be accepted, to be able to commence working for the client through an efficient handover process. These matters are addressed in Section 3.12 of ACCA’s Code of Ethics and Conduct. Clients are entitled to move to another accountant and, therefore, professional clearance cannot be withheld. That subject is comprehensively covered in the Rulebook 2006, and so this article focuses on the information needed to be transferred to achieve the efficient handover to the new accountant. You should bear in mind that the primary objective of the Code of Ethics and Conduct in this respect is ‘to ensure continuity of treatment of a client’s affairs’. Therefore, in addition to complying with your specific obligations under the Code, you should consider the reasonableness of the new accountant’s requests for information, and whether it might be preferable to supply information rather than enter into protracted arguments concerning his or her right to request it. In addition, you should refer to two new factsheets that have been posted to the ACCA website, entitled Transfer Information and Legal Ownership of, and Rights of Access to, Books, files, Working Papers and Other Documents. If you are still unsure of your obligations in a particular situation, you are encouraged to seek guidance from ACCA’s confidential advisory helpline. Types of information requested Often, you will receive a letter from the new accountant with a long list of items that he or she wants you to provide. The most contentious of these will relate to items and information held on your accounts files. (The legal ownership of books, files and other documents is comprehensively discussed in the factsheet mentioned above.) These items will fall into three categories:
It is important to note that some documents within your working papers that you consider to be your own may, in fact, belong to the client. These are discussed in more detail later. Reasonable transfer information Reasonable transfer information should be provided promptly to the new accountants, free of charge. This comprises:
The term ‘detailed trial balance’ is not defined. However, it must clearly enable the user to relate the closing balances appearing in the nominal ledger to the figures appearing in the last set of accounts. For example, consider the level of detail that is appropriate in respect of liabilities. Within a trial balance, there might be a single figure for current liabilities and another for long-term liabilities. The schedule balances, and could rightly be called a trial balance, but it is certainly not ‘detailed’. The detailed transfer information should show each category of liability (trade creditors, accruals, loans, etc). But should the transfer information include details of each trade creditor, details of each accrual and details of each separate loan? The answer is no (but see below in respect of documents belonging to the client).
Documents belonging to the client Documents belonging to the client must be given to the client (or, practically speaking, directly to the new accountant, on the instructions of the client), subject to any properly exercised lien. Ownership is not an issue if there existed a contract between you and the client (possibly within the engagement letter) requiring that a particular document or schedule should be created on the client’s behalf. In the case of other documents created by you during the course of producing a set of accounts, we have to consider the capacity in which you were acting and the purpose for which the documents were created. Also, there are further considerations where the client is a limited company. The capacity in which you were acting During your engagement with the client, you may have been acting either as principal or as agent for the client. It has been established by case law that documents created by an agent belong to the principal (for example, all documents created during a tax compliance engagement, including correspondence with HM Revenue & Customs). If you were engaged to prepare a set of accounts for the client, and in so doing prepared certain working papers in order to achieve the objective, you were working as principal. Therefore, the working papers belong to you (and you would be entitled to charge for supplying them to the new accountant or the client). Limited companies The above may also be true of a limited company client. However, the Companies Act 1985 requires books and records to be maintained that are sufficient to ‘show and explain’ the company’s transactions and that disclose with reasonable accuracy, at any time, the financial position of the company at that time. It goes on to state that the records will, in particular, contain a record of the assets and liabilities of the company. Therefore, certain schedules that ‘show and explain’ the composition of figures in the trial balance will be deemed to form part of the proper books and records of the company. Section 222(1) of the Companies Act 1985 states that a company’s accounting records ‘shall be kept at its registered office or such other place as the directors think fit, and shall at all times be open to inspection by the company’s officers’. Therefore, if you refuse to release a relevant schedule of accruals to the company, you would be prohibiting the company from complying with the requirements of the Act. Certainly, this behaviour would be regarded as unethical. Examples of such schedules are considered within the questions and answers below.
Ian Waters FCCA ACA is senior technical officer, and Nicole Ziman is head of professional conduct, both at ACCA. | |||


